Bullshit. The Obama DOJ was corrupt as hell as the head of the FBI and the AG conspired to clear that crooked POS Hillary. Your hero, Mueller's name is at the top of the list of those corrupt a-holes.Originally Posted by Guisslapp
|
|
|
|
|
Bullshit. The Obama DOJ was corrupt as hell as the head of the FBI and the AG conspired to clear that crooked POS Hillary. Your hero, Mueller's name is at the top of the list of those corrupt a-holes.
The whole Trump campaign and most likely Trump himself are the top of the list of corrupt a-holes. At least that is what the actual legally admissable evidence says.
How do you deal with voting for a fraud that we now know illegitimately got elected?
If Cohen and Manafort had worked for/with Krooked Killary, they both would have "committed suicide" over a year ago.
Would be hard for Hillary to assemble as many crooks on a campaign staff as Trump did. He is either really stupid or really unethical.
They damn well did.. You don't write a letter clearing her before you interview her. Comey didn't put her under oath when he did interview her. Wording was changed from "gross negligence" as that language is directly stated in the statute. They gave amnesty to All of Clinton's attorneys, and allowed them to be present during her interview with Comey. The investigation was just for looks, they were NEVER going to really charge her with anything.
How?? No votes were changed.. Electoral college was not impacted.
Lying to a federal investigator carries the same penalty whether you are put under oath or not.
You don’t interview the target of an investigation until you have all the facts to trap them. Clearly they had good reason to believe they didn’t have a case before the interview.
You don’t publicize an investigation of a person running for office if you are protecting them. You don’t publicly admonish them for their extreme carelessness if you are protecting them.
Campaign finance laws exist to protect the integrity of elections. Trump and Cohen committed a federal felony to hide the Daniels and McDougal stories from the public because they believed it would affect the voting. Duh!
Were the monies used to pay off Stormy and McDougal campaign $$$? If not I don't see an issue..
How is it different than driving someone to vote, that impacts election outcome.
How is it different than PACs spending dollars on TV ads..
How is it different than a Chicago candidate handing out hundred dollar bills at the end of a church service to "help" members with their "bills".
Let me ask you a question, Frisco. I take it that you are not an attorney or an engineer, but I assume you do analysis of some sort for your job.
When you do, do you collect facts and maintain them in some disordered fashion and then only after collecting the last bit of evidence, start working on your conclusion and do an analytical write up? Or do you collect facts and then start drafting your analysis while exploring additional facts to fill in any gaps in your analysis?
I can tell you from the perspective of an engineer and an attorney, I have always done the latter. It is hard to test your analysis until you give it a thorough write up so that you can question your assumptions and figure out what facts need to be further “pressure tested.”
It is pure insanity or ignorance to think an investigator would not have a work-in-progress work product detailing the then-prevailing theory of the case. Insanity or ignorance. Just think about what any rational investigator would have done by the time they were ready to
conduct the final interview of an investigation. To believe that such a preliminary write proves that the FBI started an investigation, and announced it publicly, when they never would be willing to bring forth charges that the evidence supported is also insanity or ignorance. The FBI has charged many members of the so-called swamp. This list is replete this examples that disprove your belief.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...cted_of_crimes
Why do you think they would treat HIllary any differently? Again, ignorance or insanity.
Yes, that is what Cohen’s guilty plea says. These monies were legally considered campaign contributions because the purpose they served and they were illegal because they exceeded the contribution limits and were not disclosed. Both of those are federal felonies. He said he made those payments at Trump’s direction which implicates Trump in a federal conspiracy but doesn’t exhonorate or lessen the penalty against Cohen.
Cohen alleges that Trump committed a federal crime to win an election. We will see if House Republicans will start doing their job and actually investigate the allegations. Nunes will try his best to keep that from happening.
Of course Cohen will be believed now.
Oh brother!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote