That is what Holocaust deniers say.Originally Posted by dawg80
|
|
|
|
|
That is what Holocaust deniers say.
I wasn't there either....were you?
Those deniers are friends of the left and Democrats.
It's radical socialists like Guisslapp that will be the cause the bloodshed that's almost inevitable. They do not seem to understand the building anger that exists among freedom loving Americans that will never surrender to their socialist demands. I believe people like him are trying to incite fights in the streets because they believe it would lead to the gun confiscation that would be necessary before a "new world order" government could ever be installed in America.
That was the reason obummer/Holder ILLEGALLY sold automatic weapons to the Mexican drug cartels. They were hoping those same guns would be used in mass murders of Americans, and as a result "the people" would demand draconian gun control...really confiscation. One US border control agent was killed by one of those guns. And, many hundreds, probably thousands of Mexican citizens have been murdered with those weapons. But the all-out war on American citizens didn't happen...much to the chagrin of obummer/Holder/reid/Pelosi/krooked killary et al.
I wonder if the whole Fast & Furious scandal had been swept under the rug like this if it were a GOP prez/AG who had done this...
cue: goosey with his unrelated rant on Iran-Contra.
I'm clearly missing something here. What church and synagogue shootings are we talking about that you heard were self defense?
The Sutherland springs shooting is the only one I can think of where anything approaching self defense is even debatable but that was for the hero who shot the crazy gunman.
You, and the other dizzy leftists clearly miss a lot of "something here's".
Obama's Border Patrol chief: 'It's a wall. It works'
'I cannot think of a legitimate argument why anyone would not support it'
"Morgan, who was removed from his position when the Trump administration took over, nevertheless insisted the president is correct.
“The president is right. The other day when they had the national press conference, and they got up and they said the wall works, they’re right. And it’s not based on a personal political ideology. That’s based on historical data and facts that can be proven,” he said.
Democrats, he said, are just trying to make a political point, since they themselves endorsed building walls, in 2006 and 2012, before President Trump was elected.
“I cannot think of a legitimate argument why anyone would not support the wall,” he said.
“I believe in what the president is doing. When he says that this is a national security problem he’s absolutely correct. And that doesn’t come just from me, that comes from professionals who have been doing this their entire adult lives. They’re saying it works. Why aren’t we listening to the experts?”
At issue is the president’s request for some $5.7 billion in border security that would include work on strategic sections of wall. The Democrats in Congress, most of whom previously endorsed the idea of much more money for border security and a wall, have flatly refused.
The Democrat contend a wall is a fifth century idea, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently declared it’s immoral. One Democrat claimed it would be a monument to “white nationalism.”
Carlson said it’s possible that Democrats oppose the wall because they fear it actually would work.
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/#74EK8YH635eqi60R.99
The socialist think anarchy works better.
Maybe if we had a more effective leader who knew how to build consensus...
Why are Trump’s advisors dissuading him from declaring a state of emergency and funding the wall without congress?
Build a consensus with those who seek anarchy? No thanks.
You mean those that support more money for border security, and those that already offered him even more money for a wall in exchange for DACA?
He gave them more than they were asking for on DACA and they crawfished. The socialist will never negotiate. They want open borders which equals more voters.
Truth!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
