![]() |
![]() |
Looks like Guisslapp has been giving you a ton of green to get you out of the solid red. Or are you really Guisslapp hiding behind the salty name?
You two come out of the woodwork when you think Trump might finally be toast; after disappearing when the "Russian collusion" and "cover-up" went over like a "fart in church"? Big bandwagon losers maybe?
Tyler, I got all my green from Spinoza.......Bless his little pea-picking heart. I'm assuming that somewhere in the BB&B control panel there is a switch for red/green, and that one of the big-wigs accidently turned it back on for me. Rest assured that I don't know Guisslapp from Adam. Just remember this, that I was a certified Libtard when Guisslapp was still backing the Party line.
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
https://twitter.com/i/status/1197226149337878530
This only gets better and better.......
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
Schiff’s closing remarks for each set of witnesses should be enshrined in the National Archives, encased in glass next to to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Hopefully it will be mandatory reading in all schools starting in 2020.
Oh really?
Schiff gets 3 'Pinocchios' from Washington Post over whistleblower claim
By Bradley Evans, The Western Journal
Published November 20, 2019 at 7:22pm
https://www.wnd.com/2019/11/schiff-gets-3-pinocchios-washington-post-whistleblower-claim/
I already posted the law and the cited WaPo article mentions it as well:
“ Federal law expressly restricts the inspector general’s office from disclosing whistleblowers’ identities. It says that “the Inspector General shall not disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the Inspector General determines that such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of the investigation or the disclosure is made to an official of the Department of Justice responsible for determining whether a prosecution should be undertaken.””
If you turn in your whistleblower complaint to the IG, like this whistleblower did, you are protected unless there is an unavoidable disclosure (not the case here even with the Republicans best effort) or it is referred to the DOJ (impeachment of a president doesn’t go through the DOJ).
In this specific context, one could call it a statutory right to anonymity, though it is dependent on what actions the IG takes (determination of unavoidable disclosure or referral to DOJ - where ones due process right to confront their accuser kicks in).
The identity of the whistleblower is irrelevant to these proceedings. Their complaint is based on the information we have all now seen.
If you want more facts, it would be helpful to hear from others that were closer to the situation - Mulvaney, Pompeo, Guiliani, Trump, Pence. Trump won’t let them talk. Wonder why.
July 25: Trump asks Zelensky for the favor of conducting investigations and meeting with Giuliani and Barr
Aug. 12: Whistleblower files complaint
Sept. 9: Trump tells Sondland "I want nothing"
Also Sept. 9: Congress notified of whistleblower report.
Sept. 11: Aid released
Looks like the whistleblower saved Ukraine’s (and indirectly the US’s) bacon.
The entertainment value is still pretty high. Sondland was a hoot!
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
A favor?
Look up that definition.