Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

[Guisslapp]

A favor?

Look up that definition.

Ok, Boomer.

[PawDawg]

Ok, Boomer.

Sorry you thought favor = demand...snowflake.

[Guisslapp]

Ok, Boomer.

Why don’t you look up the word “bribe”?

BRIBE
Any valuable thing given or promised, or any preferment, advantage, privilege, or emolument, given or promised corruptly and against the law, as an inducement to any person acting in an official or public capacity to violate or forbear from his duty, or to improperly influence his behavior In the performance of such duty. The term “bribe” signifies any money, goods, right in action, property, thing of value, or advantage, present or prospective, or any promise or undertaking to give any, asked, given, or accepted, with a corrupt intent to Influence unlawfully the person to whom it is given, in his action, vote, or opinion, in any public or official capacity.

[Guisslapp]

And while you are at it, read the Constitution, Article II, Section 4:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

[PawDawg]

Ok, Boomer.

Why don’t you look up the word “bribe”?

BRIBE
Any valuable thing given or promised, or any preferment, advantage, privilege, or emolument, given or promised corruptly and against the law, as an inducement to any person acting in an official or public capacity to violate or forbear from his duty, or to improperly influence his behavior In the performance of such duty. The term “bribe” signifies any money, goods, right in action, property, thing of value, or advantage, present or prospective, or any promise or undertaking to give any, asked, given, or accepted, with a corrupt intent to Influence unlawfully the person to whom it is given, in his action, vote, or opinion, in any public or official capacity.

He asked for a favor. A bribe has give and receive. Do they teach snowflakes about unilateral and bilateral? Obviously they don't understand the whole favor concept.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

And while you are at it, read the Constitution, Article II, Section 4:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Guisslapp wrong again.
And yes Ken Starr would know.

Published 3 hours ago

• Ken Starr on impeachment hearings so far: We're 'nowhere close' to impeachable offenses

[Guisslapp]

He asked for a favor. A bribe has give and receive. Do they teach snowflakes about unilateral and bilateral? Obviously they don't understand the whole favor concept.

People bilaterally exchange “favors” all the time. If you condition one thing on another, which the evidence says Trump did, it isn’t a unilateral gift. Calling it a favor doesn’t change the arrangement.

[johnnylightnin]

Didn't Mulvaney and Sondlan already call it a quid pro quo?

[PawDawg]

People bilaterally exchange “favors” all the time. If you condition one thing on another, which the evidence says Trump did, it isn’t a unilateral gift. Calling it a favor doesn’t change the arrangement.

Trump asked for a favor. He didn't offer anything in return. Your fellow socialists dreamed that one up.

[stodgdog]

More baloney. Mueller russian investigation, Clintons emails, fast and furious, Rudy the defense attorney, etc, are completely irrelevant to Trump's behavior in extorting Ukraine to start phony investigations into the fantasy corruption of the Bidens. What is relevant is that Joe Biden is running for President and Trump wanted to create some make believe dirt on him. And he used the Office of the President to concoct and execute a scheme to achieve such a result. That is what the facts show.

The facts do not support any of your claims. I don't think Trump was every worried about Biden running for president.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

People bilaterally exchange “favors” all the time. If you condition one thing on another, which the evidence says Trump did, it isn’t a unilateral gift. Calling it a favor doesn’t change the arrangement.

Marriage is exchange “favors” all the time and many times bribery/quid pro quo.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Didn't Mulvaney and Sondlan already call it a quid pro quo?

Sondlan finally stated
he didn't hear one from Trump ever but that Giuliani's request to him/Sondlan was one.
There is no bribery/quid pro quo from Trump to Sondlan. It's all of Schiff's (Gollum's/Smeagol's) bedtime story to scare the liberal steeple and their children. Just more Dem lying and scare tactics.

[Guisslapp]

And from today: Fiona Hill describes a meeting on July 10 when European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland said he and Trump's acting chief of staff had worked out a deal for Ukraine's president. Under the deal (which she referred to as a “drug deal”), Volodymyr Zelenskiy would visit the White House in exchange for opening investigations.


Also today, Nunes and Jordan look noticeably more fatigued from dancing around doing their damn dear not to step anywhere near an overwhelming amount of facts and evidence.

All that remains to be seen - will the Republicans finally come across the aisle to line up on the right side of history?

[saltydawg]

At the time Trump was very worried because the polls showed Biden beating Trump by at least 12%. The evidence shows that Trump wanted Ukraine to announce the investigations, not that the corruption in Ukraine was of any concern to him. He just wanted something to smear Biden with and that his base would accept as "proof".

[TYLERTECHSAS]

And from today: Fiona Hill describes a meeting on July 10 when European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland said he and Trump's acting chief of staff had worked out a deal for Ukraine's president. Under the deal (which she referred to as a “drug deal”), Volodymyr Zelenskiy would visit the White House in exchange for opening investigations.


Also today, Nunes and Jordan look noticeably more fatigued from dancing around doing their damn dear not to step anywhere near an overwhelming amount of facts and evidence.

All that remains to be seen - will the Republicans finally come across the aisle to line up on the right side of history?

Not sure she used that wording highlighted above or even knew it to be the case. Fiona Hill also stated there was no way Sondlan couldn't have known about Barisma and the Bidens i.e....Sondlan lied his arse off today.

All that is left is for the fallout of a sham and very boring TV soap which the Dems will live to regret.

• Fiona Hill says ex-Brookings president gave her Steele dossier just before it was published