What I said doesn’t contradict what she said. She just left out certain facts in an effort to mislead you. The info about the prosecutor being a so called “diamond prosecutor”.
Here is an article from the U.K. explaining how corrupt that prosecutor (Shokin) was.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...001.html%3famp
“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”
In other words, he wasn’t effectively prosecuting the investigation. Yes, there was an investigation, but no it was not really active. Shokin wasn’t trying to see the investigation to the end. It was effectively dormant at the time he was canned.
Nearly everyone agreed (at the time) that Shokin was part of the problem. Some conservatives are engaging in some revisionist history, ignoring critical facts, to make a fake conspiracy theory. Trump buys into it because it helps him.