|
|
You don't know either of the above. He never showed his ability to to succeed in the real world and when given a golden path to the presidency he screwed it up.Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Oh and serving as a 20 plus year politician is not "service". They get paid well for doing pretty much nothing and have zero overhead.
He stayed up late working that one night to protect Health care.
He stayed up late to grandstand his Trump hate. I understand how such a POS could be a hero to you.
Trump hate? That’s why you call John McCain a POS?
”You can’t handle the truth!”
He was grandstanding and displaying his hate of Trump. You can't deny that.
I think McCain did both. 1) he wanted to thwart Trump, and 2) he had a genuine concern there was no ready-to-go replacement for obummercare. That is what he said. He could have/would have voted to end obummercare if there was a plan to replace it.
But, I also believe it was very personal for McCain. Like Krooked Killary, he thought he was entitled to the WH. It was his turn, by Gawd! And he was insanely jealous of Trump achieving what he could not. And that smallness forever casts a shadow on him and his political career.
There was nothing genuine about McCain. He voted nay to one up Trump.
All you have to do is watch the video of him showing up to vote to understand that. He was drama queening at the highest level.
Well, y'all are entitled to your opinion, but I'll stick with my assessment of "it was both."
Could have been both.
If I remember correctly, there were many competing "replacement" plans introduced by various republican politicians. In true republican fashion, they decided they would not decide (too many fragile egos involved) and left the worst piece of legislation in the last 100 years to illustrate their failure.
Democrats are more than willing to legislate poorly in the absence of republican opposition. Dems will get behind anything they are told to vote for.
TRUTH! Dems do follow orders and march in lockstep...like good lil Nazis.
Sheeple
Put them all in jail!!
Breaking News:
18 Dec 2020
Report: Mark Zuckerberg’s $419 Million Non-Profit Contributions ‘Improperly Influenced 2020 Presidential Election
A report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the “Safe Elections” Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research–that, “improperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.”
“The 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party. Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds,” Amistad Project Director Phill Kline wrote in the report’s executive summary.
The report identified three key actions that, taken together, “represent the beginning of the formation of a two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic.”
Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution.
Executive officials in swing states facilitated, through unique and novel contracts, the sharing of private and sensitive information about citizens within those states with private interests, some whom actively promote leftist candidates and agendas.
Swing state governors also started issuing emergency executive orders shutting down in-person voting while pouring new state resources into encouraging persons to vote in advance. Polling data revealed this coordinated assault on in-person voting generally favored Democrat Party voters who preferred to vote in advance, while placing Republicans, who preferred to vote in person, at a disadvantage. These actions represent the beginning of the formation of a two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic.
“This evidence is present and available to all Americans,” Kline said at the press conference of the information included in the report.
“The mainstream media has also tried to censor this evidence,” he noted, adding that, “America understands that there are serious problems with this election.”
More
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...tial-election/
I can.
It’s not hard to remember a time when Republicans hated trump.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
