
Originally Posted by
dawg80
Seems to me, given the controls possible, there was never a reason those in nursing homes should have been at high risk. You can control access, control who is allowed in, and control the required PPEs to be worn at all times. Of course the staff has to be closely monitored, but that can be done. And as for visitors, family, again measures can easily be in place to assure, as much as it is possible, that no one was bringing the virus in. YES! some nursing homes did a great job of it, using common sense measures, getting even better as more was learned about the China virus. There are two such facilities in Natchitoches, with a total 196 residents who had ONE incident of a resident getting the virus, and that early on, like in April, but who survived...ZERO deaths. And there was one facility that was negligent and had 14 cases, out of 78 residents, 4 deaths. That one facility gave a black eye to the industry as a whole, even though the others had a remarkable track record. There are two "assisted care" facilities here that also did very well protecting residents.
Some folks, family members, pitched a fit about the controlled access, and it was those complaints that made the news and stirred up issues. It was not the facilities themselves who introduced measures designed to protect the elderly residents. Point is, I don't see why such residents need to be near the top of the vaccine priority list. Oh, unless you think it is more important to relax their protective measures and have an "open door" policy whereby visitors can come and go as they please.