Do you do mushrooms?Originally Posted by turbodawg
|
|
|
|
|
Do you do mushrooms?
Back on topic, the snowball is still rolling downhill and is gathering size and speed.
A subcommittee of the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee has released its report on the 2020 election at the request of the Judiciary Committee chairman.
Here is the Executive Summary of the report:
The November 3, 2020 General Election (the “Election”) was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy. The Subcommittee took evidence from witnesses and received affidavits sworn under oath. The Subcommittee heard evidence that proper protocols were not used to ensure chain of custody of the ballots throughout the Election, after the opening of ballots prior to the Election, and during the recounts. The Subcommittee heard testimony that it was possible or even likely that large numbers of fraudulent ballots were introduced into the pool of ballots that were counted as voted; there is no way of tracing the ballots after they have been separated from the point of origin. The Subcommittee heard testimony of pristine ballots whose origin looked suspicious or which could not be verified and the inability of poll workers to distinguish between test ballots and absentee ballots. Signatures were not consistently verified according to law in the absentee balloting process.
Poll watchers on Election Night testified that they had noted that ballots were not secured, that seals and security tags were not used, and the chain of custody was often lax or non-existent. During the recount process, the monitors observed similar patterns of unsecured ballots that had broken seals and open cases of ballots laying around for hours or overnight in unsecured locations. There was a lack of enforcement of the law, sloppy handling of the ballots by those counting, deliberate covering-up of voting numbers by workers, lack of following the process during the recount, unsafe handling of military ballots, and insecure data such as on laptops and flash drives. According to submitted testimony, there were also many equipment failures when ballots would not go through the machines and other times when ballots were counted more than once.
A great deal of testimony supported evidence of a coordinated effort to prevent a transparent process of observing the counting of ballots during the absentee ballot opening period and on Election Night. Witnesses testified to hostility to Republican poll workers during the recount – directional signage was unavailable, doors were locked, and Republican poll watchers were sent home early or given menial assignments.
Monitors throughout the state were often kept at an unreasonably long distance – some social distancing was understandable, but monitors were blocked from having the visual ability to see what was written on the ballots or to have any meaningful way to check the counting or to double-check that what was counted was actually assigned to the right candidate. They also could not observe what was entered into the ARLO system, nor could they be told the count that was being entered into ARLO. Instead, they were told that those numbers would be totaled and come back from the Secretary of State’s Office. They were also told not to take pictures, film, or have other means of acquiring proof of the process that they were experiencing based on a rule from the State Elections Board. That rule contravenes the spirit and purpose of the election law.
The Secretary of State’s Office was unresponsive to its hotline. It has been unresponsive to many who wonder if their vote ever really counted. The office has turned a blind eye to fraud to the point that it ought to be considered gross negligence.
The Subcommittee did not have time to investigate the numerous publicly reported issues with the Dominion voting machines. The Subcommittee takes notice of the various publicly reported functions of the machines and heard evidence that the machines can duplicate fraudulent ballots to the point that not even trained personnel can tell the difference between a test ballot and a real ballot. Testimony also suggested that the system responds wirelessly to being reset from an unknown location as happened with the poll books. The Subcommittee also heard that Dominion machines can be programmed with algorithms that reallocate votes between candidates. In addition, the Dominion machines are programmed to count votes using percentages of whole numbers rather than actual votes, which is a feature incompatible with the actual voting process. The Subcommittee learned that the history and control of the company that owns the Dominion voting system is unclear and provides serious implications of foreign interference in the U.S. election.
CONCLUSION
The Legislature should carefully consider its obligations under the U.S. Constitution. If a majority of the General Assembly concurs with the findings of this report, the certification of the Election should be rescinded and the General Assembly should act to determine the proper Electors to be certified to the Electoral College in the 2020 presidential race. Since time is of the essence, the Chairman and Senators who concur with this report recommend that the leadership of the General Assembly and the Governor immediately convene to allow further consideration by the entire General Assembly.
Most importantly...get control of the Ga senate races! NO MORE CHEATING BY THE DEMS!
Wait, who is trying to cheat in that election again?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flo...eorgia-to-vote
“I wanted to see how easy it was to do it,” he said. “I’m not actually moving to Georgia. I was joking.”
Maybe he was joking. It's easy for him to say that. We always assume the worst when it comes to election security, right?Still, in the video, Price is heard encouraging attendees to use the address of his brother who lives in Georgia in order to register to vote there.
When all of the legislatively-mandated election security safeguards are removed by either unconstitutional judicial rulings or through unconstitutional state executive orders or state administrative actions, you don't have to assume the worst in election security because it is guaranteed.
They removed ALL the safeguards!
Wow! Not a single procedure in place to protect the vote? That does sound bad.
In a situation like that, I don't think it's very safe to assume someone like this is joking about fraud even if he says so later. There would be no way to stop people like him!
Amen!! More crappola happening! Unfortunately, the Rinos that are the swamp want to become illegally wealthy like
Klintons, Biden’s, Pelosi’s and now the Obamas.
Giuliani: Governors Won't Give Access to Voting Machines
President Donald Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani tells Newsmax TV his team can prove their allegations of voter fraud, but the governors of the contested states won't allow access to their voting machines.
Appearing Monday on "Spicer & Co.," Giuliani, career prosecutor and onetime mayor of New York City, told host Sean Spicer that the Trump team needs to prove only 10,000 contested votes in Arizona.
"Don't you think it's going to be pretty easy to show 10,000 noncitizens voted in Arizona?" he said. "Give me the names of the people who voted and run them against a Lexis-Nexis" search, he said. "I'll come up with 40,000 noncitizens."
"Nor will they let us look at the machines," he said. "If they didn't cheat, Sean, why won't they let us examine the machines? Why does the governor of Georgia continue to hold onto the machine the city paid $110 million for, and he refuses to let us examine them?
If President-elect Joe Biden doesn't want a cloud on his presidency, he should encourage an examination of the machines, Giuliani said.
"There's no reason to go beyond anything that this election was a theft. It could be proven," Giuliani said. "I can tell you one simple thing that would prove it make the American people feel really good. Five or six of these crooked governors could let us have access to the machines. In fact, if they did, maybe I would have to apologize for saying they're crooked."
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/1002646/220
You can ignore Frisco. He is just a troll and a hack. Lol
No signature verification for mail-in ballot requests.
Mail-in ballots sent to invalid addresses (commercial or government buildings, P. O. boxes, out-of-state address for persons who are permanent residents of another state).
No chain of custody for mail-in ballot lock boxes.
Portable early voting locations when locations are required to be in a permanent government building.
No signature verification for absentee and mail-in ballots.
No ability to reasonably monitor or challenge the counting process.
Mail-in and absentee ballots using an invalid address as listed above included as legal ballots.
Counting mail-in ballots that were without the required outer security envelope.
Counting mail-in ballots that were "pristine" (unfolded). This is not possible since mail-in ballots have to be folded to be mailed.
Counting multiple ballots that were likely photocopies of a single ballot.
Illegally halting the ballot-counting process.
Illegally counting votes after poll-watchers and media were told to leave the counting location.
Illegally counting the same group of ballots multiple times.
And that doesn't touch on deceased voters, computer irregularities, and other issues.
That sounds like the democrat playbook for success!
Should it bother me that some are not bothered by any of these things? Is this that generation where we lose our freedoms/democracy?
And before someone says they have no proof and all the cases have been thrown out of court, it is my understanding that none of the courts have been willing to sit down and hear all the evidence. Easy to lose a case where you are not permitted to argue your side.
Nope. This sounds like the list of allegations in the complaint about election processes filed in the Southern District of Georgia. This case was dismissed on the merits with prejudice by the judge.
Your “understanding” is very wrong. Where did you get this understanding from?
Over and over.
So many of the signed affidavits and earth-shattering evidence end up as . . . nothing.
People swearing that the loudspeaker was too loud. Or someone gave them a mean look. Or they used the numbers from the wrong state. There has been a clear pattern.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote