+ Reply to Thread
Page 45 of 140 FirstFirst ... 3543444546475595 ... LastLast
Results 661 to 675 of 2099

Thread: Democrat voter fraud is on!

  1. #661
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by dawg80 View Post
    Our resident commies say it is "so tiring." Well what is so tiring is this repeated stealing of elections by the Dems. That has to stop. In the meantime, the focus has to be on Georgia. The commies are working hard to "steal out the vote!"
    The only effort to steal this election was led by Trump in trying to convince state legislatures not to honor the outcome of the vote.

  2. #662
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    43,941

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    November 3, 1896 was a POTUS election. McKinley defeated Bryan. If you watch "The Men who Made America" then you know McKinley was supported by the big dudes: J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie. And "for 20 hours" they sweated the tabulation waiting for the results to be announced.

    Wow, a whole 20 hours back in 1896! Only voting in person was allowed. And! there were two separate boxes for the voter to deposit his ballot, (R) and (D). Amazing! 124 years ago a nationwide election was tabulated and announced in less than a day. Well, that was before the Dems figured out how to steal elections.

    There is no question the Dems stole the POTUS election on behalf of their puppet Joe Biden. You commies should be high-fiving and gloating. Y'all did it, you stole the election.

  3. #663
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    58,093

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Mail in ballots are not "turnout".

  4. #664
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    43,941

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Stacy Abrams' sister, a judge, is allowing 4,000 illegal voters to vote. I could post about the role of the judicial, etc...but none of that really matters in this case. Just more Dem voter fraud, in plain sight.

  5. #665
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by dawg80 View Post
    Stacy Abrams' sister, a judge, is allowing 4,000 illegal voters to vote. I could post about the role of the judicial, etc...but none of that really matters in this case. Just more Dem voter fraud, in plain sight.
    Overstatement. Change of address filed with the post office doesn’t necessarily mean a voter has given up that primary address. This is just classic Republican voter suppression tactics. While you remove some people that should be removed from the registration lists, you also remove some that shouldn’t be.

  6. #666
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    58,093

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Overstatement. Change of address filed with the post office doesn’t necessarily mean a voter has given up that primary address. This is just classic Republican voter suppression tactics. While you remove some people that should be removed from the registration lists, you also remove some that shouldn’t be.
    Yes, the "right to vote" according to you comes with no conditions. Just show up and vote...two addresses = to votes.

  7. #667
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by PawDawg View Post
    Yes, the "right to vote" according to you comes with no conditions. Just show up and vote...two addresses = to votes.
    Two addresses doesn’t mean you voted twice. Their are harsh penalties for voting twice, so I am not sure why you would want to take that risk.

  8. #668
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    58,093

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Two addresses doesn’t mean you voted twice. Their are harsh penalties for voting twice, so I am not sure why you would want to take that risk.
    Harsh penalties...that's funny.

  9. #669
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by PawDawg View Post
    Harsh penalties...that's funny.
    Voters who cast "votes more than once in an election" will be fined "not more than $10,000" and "imprisoned not more than five years, or both," according to federal law.

    Not worth it.

  10. #670
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    And just a reminder - it was 3 Republicans the have been arrested in Pennsylvania for casting illegal votes for Trump. 2 did it on behalf of their deceased mothers and another tried to pass off as a second vote as his son.

  11. #671
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    58,093

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Voters who cast "votes more than once in an election" will be fined "not more than $10,000" and "imprisoned not more than five years, or both," according to federal law.

    Not worth it.
    Now you are trying to explain how democrats think by using logic. It keeps getting better.

    What are the penalties for arson and assault?

  12. #672
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    43,941

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    City Blue Imaging Company...a firm that prints election ballots, mysteriously burned to the ground the other day. Amazing it wasn't all over the news. Nothing like destroying evidence, eh. Oh, I think it was located in Rochester, NY.

  13. #673
    Champ FriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond reputeFriscoDawg has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    12,690

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by dawg80 View Post
    City Blue Imaging Company...a firm that prints election ballots, mysteriously burned to the ground the other day. Amazing it wasn't all over the news. Nothing like destroying evidence, eh. Oh, I think it was located in Rochester, NY.
    Wonder who printed the multiple versions of Fulton County ballots shown in the Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing today.

    A ballot shown for a predominantly dimmwit area had no barcode in the top right section of the ballot and looked to be printed in alignment.

    A ballot shown for a predominantly Republican area had a barcode in the area that was blank on the other version. Also alignment markers on the ballot were suspiciously different that would cause the voting circles to be out of alignment when scanned, and this would require manual adjudication.

    The dimmwit election official for the county was noted from prior comments as saying that well over 90% of the ballots required manual adjudication in the 2020 election. The manual adjudication rate in recent prior elections was in the 2-3% range. That by itself proves that the machine voting system in use was a total failure on multiple levels.

    That calls for a full manual recount using no machines, something that has been repeatedly rejected by the Georgia Secretary of State's office. Wonder why they don't want the actual paper ballots examined? Blatant cover-up is why.

    And it doesn't include feeding the same clandestine ballots into tabulators multiple times or seeing pristine (unfolded) mail-in ballots included in the count.

  14. #674
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by FriscoDawg View Post
    Wonder who printed the multiple versions of Fulton County ballots shown in the Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing today.

    A ballot shown for a predominantly dimmwit area had no barcode in the top right section of the ballot and looked to be printed in alignment.

    A ballot shown for a predominantly Republican area had a barcode in the area that was blank on the other version. Also alignment markers on the ballot were suspiciously different that would cause the voting circles to be out of alignment, and this would require manual adjudication.

    The dimmwit election official for the county was noted from prior comments as saying that well over 90% of the ballots required manual adjudication in the 2020 election. The manual adjudication rate in recent prior elections was in the 2-3% range. That by itself proves that the machine voting system in use was a total failure on multiple levels.

    That calls for a full manual recount using no machines, something that has been repeatedly rejected by the Georgia Secretary of State's office. Wonder why they don't want the actual paper ballots examined? Blatant cover-up is why.

    And it doesn't include feeding the same clandestine ballots into tabulators multiple times or seeing pristine (unfolded) mail-in ballots included in the count.
    You are an expert on dimwitedness.

  15. #675
    Champ SicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond reputeSicemDawgz has a reputation beyond repute SicemDawgz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    East of the mighty Ouachita
    Posts
    8,087

    Re: Democrat voter fraud is on!

    Quote Originally Posted by johnnylightnin View Post
    Obama wasn't running against Trump. Elections are always referenda on the incumbent. Trump was a historic incumbent for a number of reasons.

    At the end of the day, most of you guys just can't seem to believe that most folks don't love this guy the way that y'all do. That's not fraud. We've got some 50+ cases that show this. It has been investigated. Those claiming fraud haven't produced compelling evidence.
    Where have I ever posted that I love Trump? I think he did some good things, and there’s no President in the last several years that’s faced the opposition that he did to get them done, but he is a classic narcissist who couldn’t get out of his on way. He also is not nearly as conservative financially as I would like. Not by a long shot. I just can’t believe that there’s 12 million more people that will come out of the woodworks to vote against Trump than those that voted for Obama.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts