President Trump

[inudesu]

LOL. You Trump haters are such small-time thinkers.There are a lot of things about Trump to dislike and/or disagree with. But he’s a hell of a lot better than the alternative.

But go ahead and support the party that hates America and wants to destroy it. OMB so let’s support corrupt, lying, racist Joe Biden that has a 40 year record of failure. He won’t be president long anyway. You’re really supporting Harris.

Wasn't an issue of supporting Biden or Trump here. It was Republicans vs Trump.

I was just wondering how that plays among big Trump fans. I'd have assumed a split, with maybe several BB&B Trump fans opposing him this time. It's somewhat rare to hear his proponents disagree with him, so I was curious what that would sound like.

So far it sounds like "the democrats are evil" but that's not really relevant to the topic. Odd.

[inudesu]

And yet....where were these RINOs when they were passing a bill that included money for gender studies in Pakistan. Where was their outrage then? Crickets.

All hypocrites. Both sides. No arguments here on that.

So in the $600 vs. $2,000 debate you were on team $0?

[JuBru]

Exactly! I’m bringing to think Harris/Biden voters are somewhat possessed. There is absolutely zero common sense to voting fir Obama/Biden II with the Harris and even
more socialist push. Not to mention the massive 70,000,000 baby killing numbers as well as same sex marriage. I really believe Christians will be held accountable voting for this evil as it’s the prophesied “falling away” imho.

You support Trump. You have nothing to stand on here.

[PawDawg]

All hypocrites. Both sides. No arguments here on that.

So in the $600 vs. $2,000 debate you were on team $0?

Again. As Rand Paul said, why stop at $2000?

You support Trump. You have nothing to stand on here.

That's not the way it works. Being a Trump hater doesn't make you worthy to judge him any more than me being a fan of many things he did.

[inudesu]

Again. As Rand Paul said, why stop at $2000?

Because that's what the President wanted?

Apparently the question shouldn't be the President's $2,000 vs the Congressional $600, it should be those two vs nothing?

I mean, that's an argument, too. But it's another argument at odds with the President. Which is (of course) fine. But not something you see much of from Trump's big backers.

[DawgyNWindow]

All hypocrites. Both sides. No arguments here on that.

So in the $600 vs. $2,000 debate you were on team $0?

I am on team "open the businesses and let people thrive". And you cannot say that is dangerous, because Walmart and Target and a bunch of other places are already open and are thriving while people are ruined by this stupidity.

$6oo bucks, or even $2000, won't keep people alive. At today's prices, that's depression-era income....maybe less.

And through it all, the government that is destroying the livelihood and futures of people that put their heart and soul into their businesses (in this supposed land of freedom and choice) is still collecting paychecks as normal.

Maybe freedom has become more than most Americans can handle.

[DawgyNWindow]

I take it you didn’t read the White House strategy paper.

LOL! I am convinced this is the highlight of your life.

[Guisslapp]

I am on team "open the businesses and let people thrive". And you cannot say that is dangerous, because Walmart and Target and a bunch of other places are already open and are thriving while people are ruined by this stupidity.

$6oo bucks, or even $2000, won't keep people alive. At today's prices, that's depression-era income....maybe less.

And through it all, the government that is destroying the livelihood and futures of people that put their heart and soul into their businesses (in this supposed land of freedom and choice) is still collecting paychecks as normal.

Maybe freedom has become more than most Americans can handle.

Small businesses won’t thrive again until COVID is under control.

[PawDawg]

Small businesses won’t thrive again until COVID is under control.

Yeah, that was part of the plan. It's okay to keep the big chains and grocery stores open without ANY restrictions, but shut down all the small eating spots and shops in the socialist states and cities.

[DawgyNWindow]

Yeah, that was part of the plan. It's okay to keep the big chains and grocery stores open without ANY restrictions, but shut down all the small eating spots and shops in the socialist states and cities.

They are creating government dependents. I have to think it's the goal.

I hope people are noticing that being dependent on the government will pretty much get you almost enough to survive and that's about it. At that point you'll vote for anyone that promises you another dollar. Note the folks that are making those decisions are doing fine.

It's what the dem party has been doing to a vast percentage of black folks for years. Take away their choices and you can keep them enslaved forever.....and make them think it's for their own benefit.

[johnnylightnin]

Obviously, it’s the deep state.

[PawDawg]

Obviously, it’s the deep state.

It's the same people who think Obamacare was a good idea along with those who think single pay is even better. They want control, not for things to get better.

[inudesu]

They want control, not for things to get better.

They can't just be wrong?

[johnnylightnin]

They can't just be wrong?

Sure, they could be, but that doesn’t scare enough people. It’s gotta be the deep state. Deep state grift is much more profitable then “they’re wrong”.

[PawDawg]

They can't just be wrong?

For over 50 years?