In 2016 5D + 5R = 10
In 2020 7D + 6R = 10
![]() |
![]() |
In 2016 5D + 5R = 10
In 2020 7D + 6R = 10
Just planting this here...
The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time
...for commentary.
I've gone directly to the point, and you have gone round and round on this.
PA--Had no authority to allow universal mail-in voting without a constitutional amendment. Also had no authority to extend voting deadlines that have been overturned.
WI--Had no authority to allow absentee ballots to be cast without proper absentee ballot requests. Also had no authority (decision upheld by WI Supreme Court) to expand the "indefinitely confined" provision.
GA--Had no authority to enter into an unconstitutional consent agreement regarding election procedures not approved by the GA Legislature.
No evidence of fraud is needed to clearly throw out these three states.
Your illogical argument tries to claim that even if it is in direct violation of state law, state election officials can decide to conduct an election under whatever procedures they see fit. That's not how Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 reads.
It's not just my argument. This has been adjudicated.
And if you're throwing votes out because of extra-legislative changes to the election process, your vote and mine get tossed, too. And frankly, that disenfranchises me more than you (because my vote is a higher percentage of the total vote count for the guy I voted for than yours is for your guy).I want my vote to count. Even if the Governor changed some election details.
The details of the voting procedures aren't outlined in the Constitution. It just says "manner." That's a broad term that doesn't extend to the color of the paper the ballots are printed on or the precise voting locations or the budget for sharpies or what radio station should be playing in the background. How could anything get done that way?
Even if everything you say is true, your three issues are moot. If you don’t resolve those cases BEFORE the election, there is nothing a court can do after the election. You can’t proceed to play a game by a set of rules and then ask for a redo when you lose because you think the rules were unfair.
Congress can’t refuse to accept electors on such a basis - that is unconstitutional.
Call it proven.
https://rumble.com/vdlpsb-absolute-p...2fi7t&mc=5cokn
Based on his understanding of how the Dominion machines work...and he has seen schematics via some technical journals...my brother says it would take him all of 10 minutes to write code that would switch votes from one candidate to another. Of course, as he says, the real trick would be to do that and have it go undetected, which would take him a little longer to do.
BUT!! what if those who would do the detecting are already in the camp of the beneficial candidate(s)? In that case detection would not be a concern since they are not going to report the fraud anyway.
The 2020 POTUS election was stolen, and worse, now that they have gotten away with it, they will continue to do it again and again.