Democrat voter fraud is on!

[FriscoDawg]

Do you think someone submitted ballots with made up names? What are you saying? I really guess I don't know. Do you think so someone copied th ballot and just made up a bunch of fake names and mailed them in? Is that the problem (it'd certainly be a problem).

One category of those ballots used underage voters who weren't legally registered to begin with. With mail-in ballots, those illegal ballots weren't stopped because no review or checking was allowed during the counting process in those key states. And even if issues were found at the time, no challenges were allowed in violation of state election laws.

In Pennsylvania and very likely also Georgia there were potentially thousands of ballots with either duplicate or missing voter information. That's how there were thousands of more ballots counted than voters who actually voted. Pennsylvania's own vote reconciliation showed as much (over 200,000 more votes counted than voters). And back to the Michigan 3:30 AM ballot delivery, the likelihood of those being just as fraudulent as those in Pennsylvania and Georgia is very high.

Why do you think the bogus H.R. 1 bill proposes to register 16-year olds to vote? To get names legally on the rolls and make sure that fraudulent ballots can be cast for every one of them who isn't of legal voting age by election day, that's why. After 2020 the Dimmwit perps know that incorrect or duplicate voter information isn't quite going to cut it going forward. Automatic voter registration with very limited to no purging of voter rolls would open the fraud door wide open if it isn't already.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Republicans hate voter turnout. Typical.

Dems didn’t turn out. But they did “get out with the goods”. Stolen, lifted, paid for it, cheated, covered it up, swiped, 5 finger discount ......you name it they did it.

[dawg80]

Dems didn’t turn out. But they did “get out with the goods”. Stolen, lifted, paid for it, cheated, covered it up, swiped, 5 finger discount ......you name it they did it.

Granted it is one fellow's numbers, based on his research and having to make some assumptions, but his estimates place the real vote totals at

Trump 83 million Biden 55 million

I read his explanation and there is a lot of validity to it. But, I'm not sure the real difference was Trump by 28 million votes. That seems a tad high. Regardless, we all know that Trump won.

[Guisslapp]

One category of those ballots used underage voters who weren't legally registered to begin with. With mail-in ballots, those illegal ballots weren't stopped because no review or checking was allowed during the counting process in those key states. And even if issues were found at the time, no challenges were allowed in violation of state election laws.

In Pennsylvania and very likely also Georgia there were potentially thousands of ballots with either duplicate or missing voter information. That's how there were thousands of more ballots counted than voters who actually voted. Pennsylvania's own vote reconciliation showed as much (over 200,000 more votes counted than voters). And back to the Michigan 3:30 AM ballot delivery, the likelihood of those being just as fraudulent as those in Pennsylvania and Georgia is very high.

Why do you think the bogus H.R. 1 bill proposes to register 16-year olds to vote? To get names legally on the rolls and make sure that fraudulent ballots can be cast for every one of them who isn't of legal voting age by election day, that's why. After 2020 the Dimmwit perps know that incorrect or duplicate voter information isn't quite going to cut it going forward. Automatic voter registration with very limited to no purging of voter rolls would open the fraud door wide open if it isn't already.

We have already debunked that fake Pennsylvania stat. Pennsylvania has 9 million registered voters. 7 million votes were cast. Try to keep up.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wjactv....rs-dont-add-up

[dawg80]

And of course, you speak from a position of authority because you have personally verified all 9 million registered and 7 million votes. You have traveled to Pennsylvania and conducted an independent study, not just of the records, but you have personally met each and every one of the 9 million people and verify all of them, or the vast majority of them, are still upright and breathing and at the same time have tallied who they say they voted for. Right? Otherwise you are just choosing to believe what someone is telling you what the facts are. And you don't know jack shit.

[techman05]

This is the biggest issue to me with the democrats thought process in the past and the legislation they have proposed. Their fear of requiring the voter rolls to be cleansed is a huge indicator, IMO, that they know they will be caught.

[Guisslapp]

This is the biggest issue to me with the democrats thought process in the past and the legislation they have proposed. Their fear of requiring the voter rolls to be cleansed is a huge indicator, IMO, that they know they will be caught.

“Cleansing” voter rolls proposed by Republicans also removes some people that shouldn’t be removed - students attending school in other states and people pursuing temporary work in another state. Think of any example where you might forward your mail. Creating new barriers for certain classes of legit voters to maintain their registration should be avoided.

[Guisslapp]

And of course, you speak from a position of authority because you have personally verified all 9 million registered and 7 million votes. You have traveled to Pennsylvania and conducted an independent study, not just of the records, but you have personally met each and every one of the 9 million people and verify all of them, or the vast majority of them, are still upright and breathing and at the same time have tallied who they say they voted for. Right? Otherwise you are just choosing to believe what someone is telling you what the facts are. And you don't know jack shit.

Hey, moron. You don’t need to travel there to check the records.

https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElectio...tatistics.aspx

The Republicans misleading folks by introducing SURE system stats, that are not complete and not used for audits, is deliberate and not relevant to the issue.

[Guisslapp]

Granted it is one fellow's numbers, based on his research and having to make some assumptions, but his estimates place the real vote totals at

Trump 83 million Biden 55 million

I read his explanation and there is a lot of validity to it. But, I'm not sure the real difference was Trump by 28 million votes. That seems a tad high. Regardless, we all know that Trump won.

That is just silly.

[techman05]

“Cleansing” voter rolls proposed by Republicans also removes some people that shouldn’t be removed - students attending school in other states and people pursuing temporary work in another state. Think of any example where you might forward your mail. Creating new barriers for certain classes of legit voters to maintain their registration should be avoided.

I haven’t seen that in any Republican proposes legislation. Link please?

[Guisslapp]

I haven’t seen that in any Republican proposes legislation. Link please?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pol...-senate-451820

[dawg80]

Hey, moron. You don’t need to travel there to check the records.

https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElectio...tatistics.aspx

The Republicans misleading folks by introducing SURE system stats, that are not complete and not used for audits, is deliberate and not relevant to the issue.

Moron? You have to resort to name calling? tch, tch...

The point is you choose to believe what you want to believe, that which fits your agenda and narrative. But you truly don't know anything. You accept as factual that which you want to accept, and reject that which you don't like. But, bottom line, unless you have personally verified the facts...you are dependent on merely believing what others state.

[johnnylightnin]

The point is you choose to believe what you want to believe, that which fits your agenda and narrative. But you truly don't know anything. You accept as factual that which you want to accept, and reject that which you don't like. But, bottom line, unless you have personally verified the facts...you are dependent on merely believing what others state.

Some great irony here.

[Guisslapp]

Moron? You have to resort to name calling? tch, tch...

The point is you choose to believe what you want to believe, that which fits your agenda and narrative. But you truly don't know anything. You accept as factual that which you want to accept, and reject that which you don't like. But, bottom line, unless you have personally verified the facts...you are dependent on merely believing what others state.

True, I shouldn’t call you a moron, but your post was very Frisco-like.

The voter fraud arguments have gotten beyond silly and god knows America can’t afford to get any dumber.

[inudesu]

I didn’t think it necessary to memorize names. It sufficed they signed their testimony facing charges if proven false.
As it is, some have been judged as guilty without testifying.

I hope they are not someone you care about. One whose name I could give would have to give me permission because I wouldn’t want to cause her any further misery.

I don't think this is true in most cases. You can certainly sign an affidavit alleging voter fraud, be shown to be incorrect and not face any repercussion. It's really hard to prove intent, so if you just say "the poll worker had the music too loud, therefore suppression" they don't throw you in jail because that isn't voter fraud, they just note that it isn't fraud and move on. But in the meantime, Rudy can still wave a big giant stack of paper and say in a press conference "each of these is a signed affidavit about fraud" and then just sort of change the subject about why no fraud was ever shown.