Supreme Court

[Guisslapp]

I really don't see what the big deal is.. most states have voter ID requirements. TX has them, I show my DL every time I go to vote. Same in LA years ago. You can't get a stimulus check without an ID.. is that racist? You can't get government assistance without an ID. My Dr. and the medical practice that my wife works at does not see patients unless they provide an ID first time in the office. The vast majority of Americans both republican and democrats support voter ID laws. If you cannot afford them, then one could be provided for you at no charge.

What does your employer think about Texas’s voting laws?

Republicans keep suppressing the vote in Texas, but even here there are exceptions to the photo ID rule.

Some doctors choosing to require a photo ID means nothing. People without photo IDs still manage to get health care and other services.

You don’t have to have a photo ID to get a stimulus check. That is just a lie.

[glm47]

What does your employer think about Texas’s voting laws?

Republicans keep suppressing the vote in Texas, but even here there are exceptions to the photo ID rule.

Some doctors choosing to require a photo ID means nothing. People without photo IDs still manage to get health care and other services.

You don’t have to have a photo ID to get a stimulus check. That is just a lie.

Meanwhile, you continue to suppress intelligent conversation. Why are you afraid of needing an ID to vote?

[dawg80]

Meanwhile, you continue to suppress intelligent conversation. Why are you afraid of needing an ID to vote?

I know! why are libs so AFRAID of assuring "one vote for one legal, registered, legit citizen." Makes you think they want to cheat or something....nah! that ain't possible .

[techman05]

What does your employer think about Texas’s voting laws?

Republicans keep suppressing the vote in Texas, but even here there are exceptions to the photo ID rule.

Some doctors choosing to require a photo ID means nothing. People without photo IDs still manage to get health care and other services.

You don’t have to have a photo ID to get a stimulus check. That is just a lie.

But in order to cash said stimulus check, you have to have an ID or an account that was opened with at least 2 forms of ID (one being a valid picture ID). If not, then the bank teller or check casher at WalMart didn’t have proper information to be able to cash the check.

[PawDawg]

But in order to cash said stimulus check, you have to have an ID or an account that was opened with at least 2 forms of ID (one being a valid picture ID). If not, then the bank teller or check casher at WalMart didn’t have proper information to be able to cash the check.

Strawman!

[techman05]

Strawman!

Having worked in banking for 12 years of my life, I can tell you, this ID bull crap is simply that. It probably is somewhere in that straw man argument umbrella because some on here insist that ID’s are racist.

[FriscoDog]

What does your employer think about Texas’s voting laws?

Republicans keep suppressing the vote in Texas, but even here there are exceptions to the photo ID rule.

Some doctors choosing to require a photo ID means nothing. People without photo IDs still manage to get health care and other services.

You don’t have to have a photo ID to get a stimulus check. That is just a lie.

Don't know.. personally don't care.. You think they are going to move HDQ out of TX because of TX voter ID laws? Think any Fortune 100 Companies are going to uproot their HDQ and and move due to voter ID laws? ROFL.. If this were such a "nobel" cause, then why aren't the big boys who have memberships at Augusta National Golf Course giving up their memberships?? It's all BS...

[DawgyNWindow]

Oh man! Hopefully they'll get that legislation passed to pack the court with progressive liberals.

This could mean that one day Johnny's daughter (if he has one) will be able to take a school bus to the abortion clinic in a black neighborhood! Trump's fault, of course.

And his beloved RINOs continue to whine and whine.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Trump is to blame for GA, Trump is the won who called Biden’s margin a landslide, and its illogical to think 400 years of oppression magically goes away after 50 years.

The problem being discussed here is one of Trump’s own making. You don’t have to see it, but it’s true.

Georgia was stolen from Trump. Period!

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Boob Biden forgetting his beliefs, what he’s stated in the past, if he ever had any.
Not to mention the Constitution which the Regressives care zero about.

Published 14 hours ago

FLASHBACK: That time Biden called court-packing a 'bonehead idea'
Biden said FDR's attempt to do it put in question the independence of the Court 'for an entire decade.



President Biden’s one-time opposition to the concept of "court-packing" could soon be put to the test as top Democrats introduce legislation to expand the Supreme Court.

Congressional Democrats led by Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., will detail their plan to expand the Supreme Court by four justices at a press conference on Thursday. The announcement will come just days after Biden signed an executive order establishing a commission to study a potential expansion.

But support for "court-packing" would mark a reversal of an opinion Biden expressed in 1983 while serving as a U.S. senator from Delaware. At the time, Biden spoke out against President Ronald Reagan’s bid to replace three members of the US Commission on Civil Rights.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden likened Reagan’s effort to that of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who launched an unsuccessful bid to add six justices to the Supreme Court in 1937.

More

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fla...d-idea-in-1983

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Boob Biden forgetting his beliefs, what he’s stated in the past, if he ever had any.
Not to mention the Constitution which the Regressives care zero about.

Published 14 hours ago

FLASHBACK: That time Biden called court-packing a 'bonehead idea'
Biden said FDR's attempt to do it put in question the independence of the Court 'for an entire decade.



President Biden’s one-time opposition to the concept of "court-packing" could soon be put to the test as top Democrats introduce legislation to expand the Supreme Court.

Congressional Democrats led by Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., will detail their plan to expand the Supreme Court by four justices at a press conference on Thursday. The announcement will come just days after Biden signed an executive order establishing a commission to study a potential expansion.

But support for "court-packing" would mark a reversal of an opinion Biden expressed in 1983 while serving as a U.S. senator from Delaware. At the time, Biden spoke out against President Ronald Reagan’s bid to replace three members of the US Commission on Civil Rights.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden likened Reagan’s effort to that of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who launched an unsuccessful bid to add six justices to the Supreme Court in 1937.

More

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fla...d-idea-in-1983

Regressive liberal’s and those that vote to somehow allow them in power are lost as a goose and and remember not their biblical history nor duty. They remind me of the German people voting in and allowing Hitler to seize them with his socialist political agenda and the Jews allowing evil Kings to reign over them.

Published 3 hours ago

FLASHBACK: Ruth Bader Ginsburg opposed court-packing, said 'nine seems to be a good number'
In 2019, Justice Ginsburg firmly opposed expanding size of Supreme Court


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fla...-court-packing

[techman05]

Why are these liberals so worried about the bias of a court that has overwhelmingly fallen on the “liberal” side of issues since Trump’s 3 nominations?

[techman05]

If they truly wanted a “balanced” court, they should propose adding 1 seat. Require that each side nominate 5 justices. When a justice retires or passes, then the side that lost one nominates and approves a new one for their side. Eternal 5-5 split is the ultimate balance. Nothing gets done. Hey, it’s just like Congress.

[dawg80]

Why are these liberals so worried about the bias of a court that has overwhelmingly fallen on the “liberal” side of issues since Trump’s 3 nominations?

If they truly wanted a “balanced” court, they should propose adding 1 seat. Require that each side nominate 5 justices. When a justice retires or passes, then the side that lost one nominates and approves a new one for their side. Eternal 5-5 split is the ultimate balance. Nothing gets done. Hey, it’s just like Congress.

Just saw Pelosi says she will not support the move to expand the court and will not allow the measure to reach the floor of the House for debate/vote. Instead she wants to give the Biden-appointed, so-called bipartisan commission a chance to make a recommendation.


Then...introduce legislation to expand the court

[techman05]

Just saw Pelosi says she will not support the move to expand the court and will not allow the measure to reach the floor of the House for debate/vote. Instead she wants to give the Biden-appointed, so-called bipartisan commission a chance to make a recommendation.


Then...introduce legislation to expand the court

At least you don’t have to wonder what she is thinking. She reassurea us daily that she isn’t thinking.