Nice comeback..."studies show..."Originally Posted by Guisslapp
|
|
|
|
|
Nice comeback..."studies show..."
Yeah, the REAL data. Not the faulty anecdotes that prove nothing.
Yes! Huge movement to fire clown Fauci!
Published 7 hours ago
Lawmakers call for Fauci resignation or firing 'immediately' amid COVID flip-flops
Rep. Warren Davidson has proposed the 'FIRED' Act — Fauci Incompetence Requires Early Dismissal.
https://www.foxnews.com/health/lawma...vid-flip-flops
Congrats to Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Vermont for achieving 70% adult vaccination.
Yeah, remember the "studies" that he signed on to? Like the one that said the China virus was NOT created in a laboratory? I believe "debunked" was his favorite word. Like a simple rube he unquestioningly accepted what he was told, because some liberal source told him that.
Or perhaps the "debunking" of the assertion that Trump's campaign, and Trump himself, was not spied upon by rogue agents. Rube again! Studies showed it.
I hope he is still triple masking. The misery suits him.
Yawn. Congrats to those that made their own decisions, regardless of what they were, and did not become stupid lemmings.
Studies show that!
Brutal! Appropriate, but brutal. I'm thinking the "rube" thing really upsets him.
Have you notice Biden is still wearing his mask? What a idiot!
A must read.
Report Suggests Dr. Anthony Fauci Believed Experimenting on Contagious Viruses Worth the Risk of a Lab Accident
Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Biden, allegedly justified experimenting on contagious viruses as worth the risk of a laboratory accident, such as a global pandemic, outlining his view in an American Society for Microbiology analysis in October 2012, according to a report from The Australian.
Fauci, whose alleged remarks were highlighted by The Australian, “argued that the benefits of experimenting on contagious viruses – manipulating and heightening their infectious potency – was worth the risk of a laboratory accident sparking a pandemic.”
“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director reportedly wrote in the October 2012 piece.
“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?” he reportedly asked, concluding that “the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”
“It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky,” he continued, acknowledging that sloppy replications of the experiments remained a “valid concern.”
Fauci has famously flip-flopped on the origins of the Chinese virus in recent weeks, claiming on May 11 that he is “not convinced” the Chinese coronavirus developed naturally.
“No, actually. … No, I’m not convinced about that. I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of our ability exactly what happened,” Fauci told a PolitiFact reporter, who asked, “There’s a lot of cloudiness around the origins of COVID-19 [Chinese coronavirus] still, so I wanted to ask, are you still confident that it developed naturally?”
Days later, Fauci reversed course again, expressing the belief that it is “highly likely” the virus first occurred naturally.
A Rasmussen Reports survey released Wednesday found a majority expressing the belief that Fauci’s decisions and statements about the Chinese coronavirus are largely driven by political considerations.
***At this time, insofar as Breitbart News can ascertain, Dr. Fauci has not addressed the claim from The Australian.
More
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-lab-accident/
The genome of the virus still shows that it was not created in a lab, and there aren’t studies that show it was - just speculation not backed up by actual scientific evidence.
For the umpteenth time...what difference does it make if the Chicoms artificially engineered the virus* or if they "captured" the virus in the wild? The bigger point is they were tampering with it, experimenting with it in the Wuhan Lab for military purposes. Secondly, it escaped the lab and started a localized infection. Patient Zero, who died November 17, 2019, was a janitorial worker in the lab. Given how lax the director of that research was this poor lady probably encountered active virus on some materials she was cleaning as part of her job. Next, after the "accidental escape" of the virus into the community the Chicoms immediately went into PR damage control without regard to how it would spread, including how it would spread internationally.
* let us all HOPE the Chicoms didn't engineer this virus! And I shouldn't have to explain why that would be a huge concern.
Tell that to DnW. He was the one suggesting it was created in a lab.
If....and I think they were....the Chicoms were tampering with a virus trying to weaponize it, that's certainly as bad as creating the virus in the lab anyway. There are varying degrees of GUILT that can attach themselves to the Chicoms. But no matter what you think the truth is, the Chicoms are NOT clean in any scenario.
That is just wild speculation.
Yeah, we can always count on you to defend your commie comrades.
Only thing I am defending is reality.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
