Democrat voter fraud is on!

[johnnylightnin]

I drew a self-portrait on mine so it would always be clear that it was unique and mine and that nobody changed it. But I also rubbed it with bamboo silvers that glow under a black light (in a special pattern that only I know). I thought that's what everyone was supposed to do.

You voted in Texas, did they not give you crayons with your ballot? If not, you were being suppressed. We might need a Texas recount. I heard the governor changed the details of the voting rules without a full vote of the state legislature, too! You know that means none of the votes count, fortunately there is a mechanism in the Constitution that allows the previous president to be "reinstated" the following August after an election so long as he meets the threshold for pretending that he won long enough. We're almost there!

Greatness

[FriscoDawg]

Quote from the original RealClear Investigations article for those who failed to comprehend the first time.

"When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they'd been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine."

[dawg80]

Quote from the original RealClear Investigations article for those who failed to comprehend the first time.

"When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they'd been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine."

They were.

[inudesu]

They were.

A confession!

[inudesu]

True, but there is undoubtedly some research showing a typical percentage in past elections versus the percentage of ballots in this last election. I think that is the major issue for most conservatives. Why did precincts have a historical average going back 40 years of 72% voter turnout and a 96% turnout in 2020? Not saying there was cheating, but abnormal voter behavior is more than obvious. Why and how? In the past, there may have been 18% of ballots with 1 selection and the rest blank. What was they percentage now and did those ballots come from areas that typically vote a certain way? Or do those constituents usually fill in their whole ballot and decided not to just this one time?

I can think of a few unusual factors.

Polarizing incumbent. People at home being bombarded with political content. Making it easier to vote by mail (and again, the time to bother with it plus the social media promotion/explainers).

2020 was an abnormal year, it follows that there would be abnormal voter behavior (just like there was abnormal spending behavior and abnormal social behavior and abnormal media consumption, etc).

Shouldn’t we see this same abnormal behavior across the country instead of just in strategic pockets of the country?

Well, I think that probably depends. Were there no areas with abnormally (as opposed to the recent voting patterns) high Republican outcomes?

Turnout was crazy high across the board. I think some of that stuff I listed contributed to the abnormally high turnout. Some of those factors would likely contribute to higher than average blue turnout, and others maybe for red voters. Was that not the case?

Happened to see this today:

"In Pennsylvania, for example, more than 600,000 voters who cast ballots in 2020 had been eligible to vote in prior general elections but never did, TargetSmart found. More of these newly engaged voters registered as Republicans than Democrats by about 6 percentage points, giving the GOP an edge of about 35,400 voters in a fiercely competitive state - though one which Mr. Biden won…"

So, again - high turnout across the board. Not necessarily the red flag it's been made out to be.

[dawg80]

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine."

They were.

A confession!

Yep, you caught me, I participated in a huge voter fraud scheme across the nation to get Biden elected. Yes, it is all true! The 2020 POTUS election was stolen...I confess.

Whew! feels good to get that off my chest.

[dawg80]

"In Pennsylvania, for example, more than 600,000 voters who cast ballots in 2020 had been eligible to vote in prior general elections but never did, TargetSmart found. More of these newly engaged voters registered as Republicans than Democrats by about 6 percentage points, giving the GOP an edge of about 35,400 voters in a fiercely competitive state - though one which Mr. Biden won…"

MORE PROOF!

Republican votes change to Biden...fraud!

[Guisslapp]

Quote from the original RealClear Investigations article for those who failed to comprehend the first time.

"When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they'd been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine."

We already know that ballots with creases that won’t be read by the machine easily get photocopied first (thus the toner). How come evidence that the correct process was followed is so confusing to you guys?

[Guisslapp]

Btw, when you fill in a circle by doodling in the circle making many smaller loops (like most red-blooded Americans do) you either completely color in the circle or you leave a white crescent. Is the fact that many of the ballots have white crescents really surprising? Think, people.

[inudesu]

"In Pennsylvania, for example, more than 600,000 voters who cast ballots in 2020 had been eligible to vote in prior general elections but never did, TargetSmart found. More of these newly engaged voters registered as Republicans than Democrats by about 6 percentage points, giving the GOP an edge of about 35,400 voters in a fiercely competitive state - though one which Mr. Biden won…"

MORE PROOF!

Republican votes change to Biden...fraud!

More than those 600,000 previously eligible but voting for the first time voters actually voted in the election.

Naturally.

[techman05]

We already know that ballots with creases that won’t be read by the machine easily get photocopied first (thus the toner). How come evidence that the correct process was followed is so confusing to you guys?

But, would you have hundreds or thousands of ballots with the exact same marking? No. You would have hundreds or thousands of sets of 2. That is not what is alleged here.

[Guisslapp]

But, would you have hundreds or thousands of ballots with the exact same marking? No. You would have hundreds or thousands of sets of 2. That is not what is alleged here.

The allegation was actually pretty vague, as most baseless allegations usually are....short on verifiable details.

[DONW]

Happened to see this today:

So, again - high turnout across the board. Not necessarily the red flag it's been made out to be.

Pennsylvania is the state that stopped counting votes around 2 AM when Trump was ahead by 400,000. They said they weren't counting any more that night so the poll watchers went home. Then they brought in a truckload of ballots that were all Biden votes and it's a close race the next morning. Why did they want to count these votes with nobody watching them?

[Guisslapp]

Pennsylvania is the state that stopped counting votes around 2 AM when Trump was ahead by 400,000. They said they weren't counting any more that night so the poll watchers went home. Then they brought in a truckload of ballots that were all Biden votes and it's a close race the next morning. Why did they want to count these votes with nobody watching them?

Provably false. Check the time of the tweet.


https://twitter.com/commish_schmidt/...666659328?s=21

Also proves your crank was yanked.

[inudesu]

Pennsylvania is the state that stopped counting votes around 2 AM when Trump was ahead by 400,000. They said they weren't counting any more that night so the poll watchers went home. Then they brought in a truckload of ballots that were all Biden votes and it's a close race the next morning. Why did they want to count these votes with nobody watching them?

Why do you think that happened? There doesn't seem to be a record of that being the case?

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-f...-idUSKBN27Q307

The posts claim that there was a spike of 1,000,000 mail in votes for Biden in Pennsylvania on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4.

The FiveThirtyEight election blog update at 8:29 a.m. EST on Nov. 4 by Dan Hopkins, which shows a graph of the Pennsylvania vote count on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 ( here ) does not show a dump of 1 million votes for Biden alone. Between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. EST the graph says that both Trump and Biden’s votes increased by approximately 1 million. The biggest increase was from midnight to 3 a.m. after which the tallies stayed very stable, not 2:00-4:00 a.m. as the social media posts suggest.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/this...-election.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fact-ch...poll-watchers/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/penn...ry?id=73993649