+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 69 of 69

Thread: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

  1. #61
    Champ Dirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond repute Dirtydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgpix View Post
    Yeah, Dan Patrick never has any interviews on his talk show.:icon_wink:
    Go back and read what I said, oh all knowing one. I never said there were no interviews only that interviewing and news reporting aren't the primary function of talk radio. Do you disagree with that? Even so, I didn't realize we were talking about a show on the level of Dan Patrick. The last I checked Fox and Co. were on the level of your generic sports talk show that you find in any metropolis, USA whose primary purpose is opinion radio.

  2. #62
    Progressive King of 2011 Dawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond reputeDawgpix has a reputation beyond repute Dawgpix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Western Ouachita Parish
    Posts
    20,325

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Oh, DD, you've elevated me. Thanks. I thought I was just a SAC like you.

    In between all the opinions I like to hear comments from the other side.
    Everybody had their facts together. Ed pulled out the only evidence we needed to hear. . . the two travel budgets of Tech and USLULL. The show was very one-sided in reply to the columnist and won easily by the Tech side. I'd like to see a little more banter on the subject from the writer, especially when he's being piled on. That's why I'm disappointed I didn't hear an interview with him.

    As Bluecrew has told us, he tried to reach the columnist. That's all I needed to know.
    Louisiana Tech University
    Flagship of the University of Louisiana System

  3. #63
    Champ bluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond repute bluecrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydawg View Post
    Go back and read what I said, oh all knowing one. I never said there were no interviews only that interviewing and news reporting aren't the primary function of talk radio. Do you disagree with that? Even so, I didn't realize we were talking about a show on the level of Dan Patrick. The last I checked Fox and Co. were on the level of your generic sports talk show that you find in any metropolis, USA whose primary purpose is opinion radio.

    Shame on you dirty we aint Dan Patrick but I wouldnt say were generic:icon_wink:. We do however have at least one guest for each hour everyday....99% of the time.

  4. #64
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    58,162

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by bluecrew View Post
    Shame on you dirty we aint Dan Patrick but I wouldnt say were generic:icon_wink:. We do however have at least one guest for each hour everyday....99% of the time.
    nlulm grads who are lsu bandwaggoners don't count Enough of that guy already.

  5. #65
    Champ bluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond reputebluecrew has a reputation beyond repute bluecrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by maddawg View Post
    nlulm grads who are lsu bandwaggoners don't count Enough of that guy already.
    lol thats one guest madd.

  6. #66
    Champ Dirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond repute Dirtydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgpix View Post
    Oh, DD, you've elevated me. Thanks. I thought I was just a SAC like you.

    In between all the opinions I like to hear comments from the other side.
    Everybody had their facts together. Ed pulled out the only evidence we needed to hear. . . the two travel budgets of Tech and USLULL. The show was very one-sided in reply to the columnist and won easily by the Tech side. I'd like to see a little more banter on the subject from the writer, especially when he's being piled on. That's why I'm disappointed I didn't hear an interview with him.

    As Bluecrew has told us, he tried to reach the columnist. That's all I needed to know.
    Come on, DP. You know that no one can even come close to my SACness.

  7. #67
    Administrator DocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond reputeDocMarvin362 has a reputation beyond repute DocMarvin362's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bossier City, LA
    Posts
    14,855

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydawg View Post
    Come on, DP. You know that no one can even come close to my SACness.
    Including your wife.

  8. #68
    Champ WWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond reputeWWDog has a reputation beyond repute WWDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    7,977

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    I haven't posted on this subject in some time. I think the all the talk about Tech playing nlu or ulm or whoever they are now days and how Tech should come back to the sunbelt are a sign of fear from both parties. Fear that we are about to get back on track after beign derailed for so long. The only way they think they can hold us back is to limit us. What we really need is for Tech people to begin to come to the games again and finish reworking our athletic department. Once we begin to back Tech and get some wins under our belt, these rediculous thread will go away.
    WWDog
    La Tech
    Region and hyphen free since 1894!
    Flagship of the University of Louisiana System

  9. #69
    Champ Dirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond repute Dirtydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: ARTICLE - TIME FOR TECH TO COMEBACK TO SUNBELT?

    Quote Originally Posted by WWDog View Post
    I haven't posted on this subject in some time. I think the all the talk about Tech playing nlu or ulm or whoever they are now days and how Tech should come back to the sunbelt are a sign of fear from both parties. Fear that we are about to get back on track after beign derailed for so long. The only way they think they can hold us back is to limit us. What we really need is for Tech people to begin to come to the games again and finish reworking our athletic department. Once we begin to back Tech and get some wins under our belt, these rediculous thread will go away.

    Exactly.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts