If you don't know what other choices Rupp had, then how in the hell can you criticize him for the choices he's made? They may have been his only options.Why do you think that the high schoolers that go to the jucos do so? By far the majority do so because they failed to make their grades or failed to score high enough on the ACT or SAT. Do you really believe that a kid that struggled through four years of high school is going to miracuoulsy become a good student after two years at a juco. Most jucos continue to be academic liabilities that require close supervision and tutoring just to keep them academically quaiified until their athletic eligbility expires.
As for what I would have done--that is impossible to answer because I do not know what other choices Rupp had at his disposal. But I think that we can agree that he did make some bad choices.
As for congratulating Rupp on his stern discipline, he had no choice but to dismiss White and Clarke. In the course of human events, some things are self evident. Theft is not only a disciipline problem, IT IS A CRIME. Had they not received special treatment, perhaps because they were Tech athletes, they would be indicted by now.
In a previous post we took a look at the makeup of the Idaho Vandal squad--NINE HIGH SCHOOLERS AND FIVE JUCO/TRANSFERS. The Nevada Wolfpack has TEN HIGH SCHOOLERS AND TWO JUCO/TRANSFERS. Both of the programs that you sited as examples of how to do it right appear to be doing exactly what the majority of Tech fans would have patiently waited for Rupp to do. Build a solid program with quality high schoolers (both academically and athletically) and sprinkle in a very minimum number of jucos to fill in the critical voids. He chose not to and so far (the key words in this sentence are SO FAR) it hasn't worked. Will it? I don't know, but I am sorely disappointed in what has transpired thus far this year. I don't hold him responsible for last season.




Reply With Quote


