![]() |
![]() |
No, the problem is probably both.
IT'S A VOLCANO!!!!!!!! They spew CO2.
Like I stated; "What better evidence that Salty doesn't read for comprehension or understand science!!!!!!!"
link
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=...48890d3c90c6fc
And then this
Mauna Loa Volcanic Carbon Dioxide Emmissions 1958-2001 - NOAA ...
The MLO CO2 emissions record (1995 and 2001 papers) is an important component in the "geophysical picture" of how Mauna Loa volcano works. ...
www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/obop/mlo/.../volcanicco2/volcanicco2.html - Cached
Last edited by TYLERTECHSAS; 02-23-2010 at 09:53 PM.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
It's the water vapor along with natural solar cycles. Even if it could be controlled (which it can't be), the left-wingnut loon fringe is going after the wrong things.
They are monitoring CO2 emissions at Mauna Loa to see if there is a correlation between emissions and eruptions. That data gathering has nothing to do with global warming and any use of that data for that purpose is fallacious.
At night a temperature inversion forms near the ground, trapping volcanic emissions coming from Mauna Loa summit fumarloes in a layer tens of meters thick. Down slope winds sometimes transport these emissions to the observatory, where they are detected as a "noisy" increase above smooth baseline levels for some gases. A volcanic component can be estimated by taking the difference in concentration between periods when the plume is present and periods immediately before and after that exhibit baseline conditions. The most significant volcanic gas is CO2, which has been monitored since 1958 through three eruption cycles Volcanic CO2 is greatest shortly after an eruption and then decreases exponentially over the subsequent years. Right after the 1984 eruption, Mauna Loa emitted as much CO2 as an American city of 40,000 people. By 2005, these emissions had fallen by a factor of about 100. This suggests that a reservoir deep beneath the summit is recharged with fresh, CO2 rich magma during and immediately following an eruption which is then quiescently outgassed at an inverse-exponential rate. There were substantial emissions of SO2 and aerosols following the 1975 eruption and much lower levels were seen after the 1984 eruption. By 2000, SO2 and aerosol emissions from Mauna Loa had fallen below detection limits. The CO2 and SO2 data is examined weekly for any significant events which may signal renewed activity in the volcano. The long-term records are updated yearly.
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
Any questions?
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
So you come on here trying to pass this off as evidence of "dangerous levels of CO2" in the atmosphere, and now you're playing if off as though you knew it was only being measured around the volcano? Do you even realize how idiotic you look for posting this nonsense in an effort to support the global warming farce? This sort of crap is exactly why everyone thinks people like you are crackpots... putting aside the fact that you are, this is just one more piece of evidence that you--along with Al Bore and others--are snake oil salesmen.