![]() |
![]() |
Vandy actually does NOT have the lowest athletics budget in the SEC, which is what I would have suspected. I think they are the 2nd or 3rd lowest....I also seem to remember M State was below them.
*These numbers are a year old.
07-08 SEC Athletics Budgets
$123,769,841 - Alabama
$106,607,895 - Florida
$101,806,196 - Tennessee
$89,311,824 - Auburn
$85,554,395 - Georgia
$85,018,205 - LSU
$71,727,243 - Kentucky
$66,545,953 - South Carolina
$66,174,916 - Arkansas
$45,521,855 - Vanderbilt
$34,769,709 - Ole Miss
$30,440,090 - Mississippi State
07-08 Big Ten Athletics Budgets
$115,737,022 - Ohio State
$99,027,105 - Michigan
$95,118,124 - Wisconsin
$91,570,233 - Penn State
$81,515,865 - Iowa
$81,390,686 - Michigan State
$68,951,692 - Minnesota
$67,818,403 - Illinois
$64,253,784 - Purdue
$57,155,333 - Indiana
$41,835,733 - Northwestern
07-08 Big XII Athletics Budgets
$120,288,370 - Texas
$98,874,092 - Oklahoma State
$92,476,146 - Texas A&M
$82,976,047 - Kansas
$77,098,008 - Oklahoma
$75,492,884 - Nebraska
$55,566,932 - Missouri
$52,631,896 - Colorado
$52,599,785 - Texas Tech
$49,113,706 - Kansas State
$44,151,763 - Baylor
$38,621,346 - Iowa State
07-08 Big East Athletics Budgets
$83,352,439 - Notre Dame (non-football)
$56,540,896 - Louisville
$55,218,003 - Connecticut
$54,262,716 - West Virginia
$52,012,491 - Rutgers
$44,702,831 - Syracuse
$39,741,621 - Pittsburgh
$34,935,813 - South Florida
$32,281,546 - Cincinnati
07-08 ACC Athletics Budgets
$73,458,494 - Florida State
$67,820,335 - Duke
$66,148,186 - North Carolina
$64,412,343 - Virginia Tech
$64,396,612 - Virginia
$61,203,340 - Boston College
$59,624,100 - Maryland
$59,180,652 - Clemson
$54,511,968 - Georgia Tech
$46,849,990 - Miami
$45,632,223 - North Carolina State
$39,961,624 - Wake Forest
07-08 Pac-10 Athletics Budgets
$76,661,466 - Stanford
$76,409,919 - USC
$66,088,264 - UCLA
$64,326,057 - California
$60,729,016 - Washington
$56,623,901 - Oregon
$54,833,194 - Arizona State
$52,875,339 - Oregon State
$49,241,506 - Arizona
$39,621,060 - Washington State
Last edited by Dawg06; 05-19-2010 at 11:38 PM.
Big Ten Conference Revenue 07-08
$23,662,435 - Indiana
$22,753,996 - Purdue
$22,653,081 - Iowa
$21,743,701 - Illinois
$20,845,136 - Michigan State
$20,732,405 - Michigan
$20,152,945 - Wisconsin
$18,871,037 - Minnesota
$9,463,082 - Ohio State
N/A - Northwestern
N/A - Penn State
SEC Conference Revenue 07-08
$14,178,616 - LSU
$13,138,751 - Florida
$12,995,297 - Kentucky
$12,925,282 - Arkansas
$12,811,908 - Georgia
$12,246,757 - Auburn
$11,566,425 - South Carolina
$11,155,952 - Mississippi State
$10,864,745 - Ole Miss
$10,864,150 - Tennessee
$7,229,425 - Alabama
N/A - Vanderbilt
Last edited by Dawg06; 05-20-2010 at 01:29 AM.
That list of conference distributions doesn't include NCAA dists I think. So a higher level of competition in football and basketball would be a consideration. I think the big 10 does ok in that department.
Article on the WAC 16 experiment and what it might mean for the Big 11/16:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...html?eref=sihp
Finally Benson says something smart:
As the ratings came in during the first year of the 16-team league, it became obvious that just because TCU was in the conference didn't mean people in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex would tune in en masse. Ditto for Rice and the Houston market and San Jose State and the Bay Area market.
"Just because you have Houston in your market doesn't mean you can deliver Houston," Benson said. "One of the other keys to a large number of schools is how much they can deliver your population. ... We advertised that we had the Houston market, the Dallas market and the San Francisco market, and yet there was such minimum penetration."
That is where CUSA was misguided, as well - even after the WAC break up. They have gone after programs with large market areas, but that doesn't mean those programs can deliver those markets. Let's hope they learned their lesson on that.
TWSSyet there was such minimum penetration
''Don't be a bad dagh..."