Since you're so smart, would you tell me what this is?Originally Posted by DogtorEvil
|
|
|
|
|
Since you're so smart, would you tell me what this is?
Thanks for posting that one.
If you have to ask, you must be pretty stupid.Since you're so smart, would you tell me what this is?
Or just old.
Im serious when I say, I don't know what you mean here. I've been pondering it since you posted this. From my vantage point I am consistent. All of us think we are sane too, so I suppose I could be inconsistent and not kno it.
It's time to close the doors to the Temple of Janus.
PONDER this:
I am not who you think I am.
I am not who I think I am.
I am who you think I think I am.
The guy you say you will vote "for" is not a vote for, but a vote against. We had the same discussion during the governors race.
Who wrote that, Stan Poynt?
Does that mean Maddawg thinks I think I'm inconsistent?
It's time to close the doors to the Temple of Janus.
That sounds like you are saying I am consistent.
I really am a libertarian. There is a libertarian candidate. I'm going to vote for him. This time I really am voting for somebody.
But, I don't wish to deceive. I am voting against Hillary and Trump too. It is insanity to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect different results. What I can't understand is why people don't see it. The Republican Party is a big central government, big spending, oppressive police state party. They just lie about it.
It's time to close the doors to the Temple of Janus.
This is your chance to vote anti-establishment and make a difference, especially if Trump picks another Tea Party guy or gal as his VP. A libertarian vote doesn't do that at all.
The Democratic Party is now the Socialist Party!!! Obama began that change as soon as he got into office. It has gotten ten times worse with Bernie as a candidate!!
Trump shouldn't be confused with the Tea Party. He speaks nothing of our national debt or cutting entitlements. He was for socialized medicine as late as a month ago. He was for the bailouts and for impeaching Bush. He wants the rich to pay for government spending with tax increases. He is just a guy who wants to build a wall and make better deals with China, for the most part. He's pretty moderate to left on other issues. The establishment is only against him because he embarasses them and they think he makes us all look like racists with his rhetoric. He would be a good deal-maker with both parties if elected.
Johnson is an abortion candidate. So I can't get behind him.
Reps = Dems, just minor disagreements about who gets the money they steal.
Most libertarians are for baby killing.
Which is weird, because that would seem to violate the principle of Right to Life, Liberty, and Property.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
