Here I disagree, but, not surprisingly, it is a matter of semantics. The "laws" of physics are a human attempt to describe created phenomena. So, inasmuch as they are "written," they are also "imperfect." Similarly, when we try to apply our understanding of these created phenomena to solve problems or extend our capabilities, these endeavors are fraught with imperfections, because our understanding of the phenomena are limited.
I think the same holds true for communication. We are still trying to figure this whole thing out, so we try to come up with some agreed upon rules for applying the ability to communicate. As with physical phenomena, things tend to work smoothly to the extent that all parties share a reasonably overlapping understanding of the phenomena, and that their understanding of the phenomena fits well enough with the realities of the phenomena.